Updated Surplus Numbers

Updated Surplus Numbers
Updated Surplus Numbers: Actual surplus 2018 per audit was $85,163.
Boards 2011-2018 implemented policies and procedures with specific goals:
stabilize owner fees, achieve maintenance objectives and achieve annual budget surpluses.
Any surplus was retained by the association.
The board elected in fall 2018 decided to increase owner fees, even in view of a large potential surplus

Average fees prior to 2019

Average fees prior to 2019
Average fees per owner prior to 2019:
RED indicates the consequences had boards continued the fee policies prior to 2010,
BLUE indicates actual fees. These moderated when better policies and financial controls were put in place by boards

Better budgeting could have resulted in lower fees

Better budgeting could have resulted in lower fees
Better budgeting could have resulted in lower fees:
RED line = actual fees enacted by boards,
BLUE line = alternate, fees, ultimately lower with same association income lower had
boards used better financial controls and focused on long term fee stability

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Reply from Communications Director to Copyright Issue

On June 17th, I received an email reply from our Communications Director to my email to her on June 4th. This the second of three posts regarding this.

Here is a slightly edited text of that email [square brackets denote edits]:

"Hello Norman,

Thanks for your note. I am aware of copyright infringement policies, and respect them, as I routinely use photographs, diagrams, and other media at work.

Before I used the Mistylook image for the Manor Briefs masthead I emailed [the author], the creator, and asked for permission to use it temporarily. My note to him explained that we’re “. . . developing a website and the newsletter pdfs will be posted to that site. On the mastheads, I've added a hyperlink to your website to acknowledge your ownership of the image. Do you require any further copyrights?”

[The author] replied “Thanks for writing to me. I am OK as long as my link is mentioned.”
I also emailed the photographer of the Salisbury Cathedral image, [the author's name], and explained that our “. . . June newsletter features an article on Salisbury that I illustrated with one of your photos of the cathedral. I've added a hyperlink to your website to acknowledge your ownership of the photo.. Do you require any further copyrights?”

[The author] replied “It sounds like you are doing the right thing. However, in addition to the photographer credit, you also need to indicate that the image is licensed under the cc-by-sa-2.0 license. I think you can even find a logo for this on the Creative Commons website.”

The online versions of the newsletters contain hyperlinks on all the photos. In the June issue, hyperlinks can be found on the masthead, Flag Day poster, Salisbury Cathedral, fireworks photo, and the CertainTeed shingle. To honor [the author's] of indicating the CC license, I also included the Creative Commons logo and hyperlinked it to their website.

In the print version of the June issue, a second line to the caption under the cathedral photo gave credit to [the author]. After the issue was printed, I noticed that that line was missing, and in checking my documents, I discovered that an earlier draft of the article (which did not include the photo credit) had been used in the final version of the newsletter.

To prevent future credit oversight, I’ve added a photo/image credit section to the newsletter template so all copyright attributions (sic) will be in one place. The June online version includes this section.

Regards,
[Communications Director]"

The email from our Communications Director included an Acrobat 6.x file created June 17th. It was a color version of the newsletter which contained photo credits added to page 2, and a reference to the "cc-by-sa-2.0 license". I sent a final reply to our Communications Director on June 17th, and I made several requests. One of my concerns was the lack of an "errors and omissions" section in the newsletter. The June newsletter had been published with several errors, including the "costs" of projects and which I pointed out to the entire board during the June Association meeting, and it had been published and distributed without the proper copyright notices. That email will be posted as the third in this series.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please leave a comment!

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.