Updated Surplus Numbers

Updated Surplus Numbers
Updated Surplus Numbers: Actual surplus 2018 per audit was $85,163.
Boards 2011-2018 implemented policies and procedures with specific goals:
stabilize owner fees, achieve maintenance objectives and achieve annual budget surpluses.
Any surplus was retained by the association.
The board elected in fall 2018 decided to increase owner fees, even in view of a large potential surplus

Average fees prior to 2019

Average fees prior to 2019
Average fees per owner prior to 2019:
RED indicates the consequences had boards continued the fee policies prior to 2010,
BLUE indicates actual fees. These moderated when better policies and financial controls were put in place by boards

Better budgeting could have resulted in lower fees

Better budgeting could have resulted in lower fees
Better budgeting could have resulted in lower fees:
RED line = actual fees enacted by boards,
BLUE line = alternate, fees, ultimately lower with same association income lower had
boards used better financial controls and focused on long term fee stability

Monday, April 5, 2010

Unresolved Street Problems Erupt

Last year, our former AD continued his efforts to move this association in a certain direction. That included driveway repairs, new roofs and Lakecliffe repairs. He was stopped and removed from the board. Others, most notably our CD, have a better idea. Others on the board seem to think that repairs and what not, occur "automatically" here at BLMH. They don't. The only thing "automatic" is the collection of fees. The board decides exactly how every dollar is spent here at BLMH. Did you see "Lakecliffe Repairs" as a line item on the budget this year? It wasn't. The board will again deliberate and will probably, as discussed briefly during the most recent association meeting, have the original contractor survey this street and make recommendations, possibly including "warranty repairs". Good luck!

So "How did the new direction for Lakecliffe turn out"?

As requested, last year I provided information to our previous AD regarding issues with this street and possible corrective measures. Why last year? Because the red lights were flashing and the alarm bells were chiming. That's why! Cores were taken. Some of the issues were debated among the board during association meetings, it turned into finger pointing and repairs were never implemented. I guess protecting those out of compliance, parties, more tulips, lots of mulch and so on were much more important. Recommended repairs, and the widening and sealing of cracks, to save this street, were not done. Ah well, we have more important things to do and to spend our fees on, here at BLMH.

This year, people look at the street and say "How could this happen?" Why wasn't this corrected, how was the street allowed to get into this condition, "what do we get for our fees" etc., etc., etc.  I view it as the "Katrina Effect". Unit owners are comfortable and when the street began crumbling beneath us, still seemed to be okay. So everyone puts their attention on other, "more important" things.  However, water does enter the widening cracks, and does damage the sub-base. The few cracks begin to spread and checkering takes place, as heavy trucks and cars drive over the weakened street. The condition worsens and the damage spreads to larger areas. Holes begin to pop-up as the "mortally wounded" sub-base and "bituminous concrete" shift, crack and splinter. Ever larger areas of the street begin to pop out and holes, once a few, now begin to form throughout. You can see this in the following photos. Last year and the year before, the issues were only visible to the discerning eye. But no longer!

Eventually these problems become obvious to all, but by then it is simply too late. Ah well, it's like watching a slow motion train wreck again, and again and again.

My concern about Lakecliffe, then and now? Protecting the sub-base of this street and halting its expensive destruction. As the cracks form, water enters, the cracks widen and the sub-base erodes, accelerating the destruction. As predicted, at some point, the street will simply disintegrate. How are we doing? Well, here are some of the consequences to Lakecliffe due to the lack of action. It isn't simply a warranty issue. Some of this may have begun as a warranty issue, but if damage is not speedily corrected, this is what happens:

Note: the object in the photo is a yardstick. Clicking on the photos will enlarge them (1).















But, we can all feel great because our fees didn't go up this year. Whoopee! 

The question is, what is more important to the unit owners? Reducing fees or proper maintenance and repairs?  Lakecliffe is one of the "billboards" that advertises our association to potential buyers. Our "official" website shows beautiful streets lined with trees in fall colors. But enter the community and the above is what greets you. Walk the site and view the trash at the shore of the northerly lake, etc. Somehow, the reality that greets the home buyer hasn't made it to our communications department. Buyers in this discriminating market aren't going to buy our color brochures. They'll walk the site, kick the tires and put the propaganda in the circular file.  Ah well!

I suppose, the new board members will simply blame the former board members. Blame is certainly easier than taking appropriate action or taking responsibility. Certain unit owners will attend the association meetings and spread the party line, and certain board members will sit there, expressionless and smug, while the tar and feathering goes on. 

We don't anticipate, we react. We don't manage, we administer. We don't lead, we rule. We don't plan, we party. We don't prepare, we complain!  We don't enforce the rules, we promote chaos. We don't spend money pro-actively, we spend money on damage control. Welcome to the new and improved BLMH! Question to the board of managers: Do you REALLY think this is what current and prospective unit owners want here at BLMH?  Feel free to publish a multi-colored response in the font of your choice in the next issue of the newsletter. 

==================================
References, Errors, Omissions, Comments:

(1) Added note elaborating on the presence of a yardstick in the photos, per a question posed by a unit owner. 

11 comments:

  1. "We don't prepare, we complain!"

    Coming from you, Norm, I find this statemnt pretty hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why is that?

    Norm has hit the nail on the head. Do you have a problem with that?

    Explain yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. non. 4:52 PM:

    I was in NOLA right up to Katrina and I spent my last minutes there attempting to get others to leave. They declined and paid the price. I returned and was involved in the "resurrection" thereafter. I spent weeks at a NOLA facility which had been "under water" and worked to restore it to production.

    Frankly, you are absolutely, totally clueless and you have no idea of what you are speaking about.

    I've deleted your "comment" which is frankly, giving you more credit than you deserve or are entitled to, because of your profanity. I'd prefer to leave it here, so others can see what unit owners at BLMH have to deal with, and what our former members of the Board of Directors had to deal with.

    Keep it clean and stick to the issues or I will always delete your comments.

    Do you understand? I'm not the R&R Director. I'm not going to look the other way. No one on the board can coerce or intimidate me. I'm not your "friend". I may be a neighbor but I don't have to condone or support your actions. I don't want or need your "vote". Do you understand me?

    This is one of the few times I'll address you or any others with similar predilections. So cherish it!

    Norm

    ReplyDelete
  4. Norm suppresses free speech!

    ReplyDelete
  5. We tore up and redid Lakecliffe Drive in late 2004, along with many driveways. I remember it well. Not only did I have to park my car at the west end of Thames Court and walk all the way to my unit on Lakecliffe Drive, but so did my wife who was nine months pregnant at the time. Now, we are watching as Lakecliffe Drive begins to disintegrate before our very eyes. What did we pay for in 2004? This? Was this our wise investment for the future? I fully support the concept of exercising due diligence and funding proper maintenance of the units, the streets, the sidewalks, etc., here at Briarcliffe. However, I don't consider it an act of irresponsibility to question those expenditures if we're not going receive a quality result. To do so is no better stewardship than to refuse to maintain Briarcliffe at all. At the end of the day we're still wasting money. If we're going to implement repairs and perform maintenance work, let's get the best bang for our buck. Are we going to tear up Lakecliffe Drive again and again, every couple of years, just to prove that we are "good stewards?" To fund this need to prove ourselves "faithful" must we pay higher and higher assessments without question? NO! Not this unit owner!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why can't we fix the streets with the current funds? This is not about who said what to who else. It's basic. Those who are whining about increases in fees and are not supporting some current spending on fixing the roads will most likely have increases in the near future. We have roofs and roads to fix NOW. I do not want dangerous potholes and leaking roofs. Basic survival issues is where we are at. If we wait the costs will increase. Period.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't get why people are taking these conversations personally. This is about solving things. This is not about who likes who else or whether we are having a tea party. This is not about attacking each other. Do you want a working community? When I moved here the landscaping was gorgeous. It was one of the reasons I chose this place. The variety of flowers, the way the hedges and grounds were kept were so special, so well done that I was in awe. Not many other multiple unit properties are like this. I think the place still looks good, but it has lost the richness and some of the care, some of the variety. I think we need some perspective. If all we are doing here is attacking each other then we are not solving the problems. Is this time to pray for each other? Perhaps so.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's time to repair the streets. I am willing to help with that. I don't have experience, but it needs to be done.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Let us Pray!
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    !
    Amen!

    ReplyDelete
  10. As I said in my earlier comment, I'm all for the proper maintenance of Briarcliffe and the exercise of due diligence to achieve a lasting, quality result re. upkeep. What I object to is the mere expenditure of funds for its own sake, as if that alone were wise and righteous. Further, it offends me that some, not necessarily in this blog, but in the country at-large, portray frugality - even in these economic times - as naive, laissez-faire, and irresponsible. "If you're not willing to spend then that just proves that you don't care." Nonsense!

    Who, I wonder, decided that there are only two options for BLMH: (1) do nothing or (2) do something, anything - regardless of whether or not it is wise, frugal, or prudent? If the previous board was so wise, why is Lakecliffe Drive disintegrating before our eyes following the major street & driveway repairs and replacements it authorized (see my previous post)? Yes, it's true that we have to fill the potholes NOW, but what is the long-term solution? In our frenzy to do something NOW will we again waste our hard earned money?

    This morning, I drove up and down Lakecliffe Drive and noticed eight units with key boxes on the garage doors. That's right, eight. This figure does not include any units for sale on the side streets. People are leaving Briarcliffe. They are moving out. I meet people everyday, as I'm sure others do too, who are unemployed or underemployed. Where are we going to get the money to pay higher and higher assessments in an economy like this one? Where? How are we as unit owners supposed to keep on paying? How?

    I don't think that questioning, and even objecting to, BLMH expenditures in an economic downturn like this, is out of line. It's not out of line at all. In addition, I object to the whole notion that such questions and objections reflect an attitude
    of adolescent irresponsibility. "Oh, you must think these things all just happen automatically, don't you?" No, I know better. However, I have a wife and a young son and am currently underemployed, making less than I did before the downturn. Therefore, I see no problem in pinching every penny, and - if necessary - postponing certain things until times improve. I don't consider that naive. I consider it facing reality. I agree that we have to do something NOW. In addition to praying - always a good idea - we need to think - also a good idea. Then we need to act, wisely and prudently, in the light of the economy in which we currently find ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
  11. WT P:

    It has been extremely painful for me to observe what is occurring here at BLMH.

    I agree with you that Lakecliffe is a serious problem. I also view it as a metaphor for what is happening to BLMH. We have lost "structural integrity".

    We can put bandaids on things, but we really need to address the core issues. Those issues include long term plans, allocating resources - both human and financial, and establishing priorities. It is possible the installation of Lakecliffe was flawed. More cores need to be taken and an assessment made, by professionals who are certified for such things. Question: Can we stop the decay of this street? What alternatives are there? Can we extend its life and if so, how much time will we gain? Is that the prudent course? What is the best expenditure of funds? Or, should the funds be spent in other ways?

    These are questions to be asked. Our board is dominated by concerns over rule changes for social agendas, etc. This association is not a social club.

    However, the unit owners of this association, as a group and collectively, decided that is what is important to them. I mean that in all sincerity. The 50% who vote at our annual elections made that decision. The remaining 50% decided to "go along" for the ride.

    Lakecliffe was flagged as a problem about two years ago. It wasn't very serious then. However, these things have a way of accelerating, particularly if structural integrity of the sub-base, or the under-pavement, is lost. Now it has become more serious, and visible problem.

    We have a choice. We can plan our future here at BLMH or we can simply react. Seems the consensus is to react. Not everyone agrees and that may be the source of the lock boxes you see. I'm not planning on joining that group. I am considering renting my unit. That way, I won't have to see this each and every day.

    ReplyDelete

Please leave a comment!

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.