Above: Intermittently, for a time, boards informed owners of association finances
Newsletter 2008 excerpt is an example of earlier board willingness to communicate with owners.
The boards of 2019-2021 prefer not to do so.
https://tinyurl.com/BLMH2021
Life and observations in a HOA in the Briarcliffe Subdivision of Wheaton Illinois
Best if viewed on a PC
"Briarcliffe Lakes Manor Homes" and "Briarcliffe Lakes Homeowners Association"
Updated Surplus Numbers
Updated Surplus Numbers: Actual surplus 2018 per audit was $85,163.
Boards 2011-2018 implemented policies and procedures with specific goals:
stabilize owner fees, achieve maintenance objectives and achieve annual budget surpluses.
Any surplus was retained by the association.
The board elected in fall 2018 decided to increase owner fees, even in view of a large potential surplus
Average fees prior to 2019
Average fees per owner prior to 2019:
RED indicates the consequences had boards continued the fee policies prior to 2010,
BLUE indicates actual fees. These moderated when better policies and financial controls were put in place by boards
Better budgeting could have resulted in lower fees
Better budgeting could have resulted in lower fees:
RED line = actual fees enacted by boards,
BLUE line = alternate, fees, ultimately lower with same association income lower had
boards used better financial controls and focused on long term fee stability
Showing posts with label Thought of the Day. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thought of the Day. Show all posts
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Is Happiness a Worthy Pursuit?
As I enter a new year, I think it is useful to get some perspective for what lies ahead.
"The purpose of life is not to be happy. It is to be useful, to be honorable, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you have lived and lived well."- Ralph Waldo Emerson.
I'm not a big proponent of New Year's resolutions, but I will attempt to post weekly here, in 2012.
Labels:
Thought of the Day
Thursday, February 25, 2010
Interlude - An Association that works "For All of Us"
As I study this great American experiment in community living, I do wonder how it will turn out. Some experts say that condominiums are failing to be the social and living systems that they were intended to be. At this juncture in time, I would say, with my personal experience, that they are possibly correct.
Is such failure pre-ordained? Is it inherent in the structure of this organization and is it woven into the fabric, its very being? Are we destined, as a former board member once told me "to slip continuously into mediocrity?"
There are questions which would seem to be vital and must be asked. If we are not to simply operate out of subjective "change" which is defined as positive and negative, and based upon fundamental human issues such as fear and greed, and "winners" and "losers" then what should we be operating from? These are questions for our leaders to ask, to answer and to express in their daily actions. Leadership on the board and by the board as a single entity is the only possible way out of the morass that encompasses this association.
Are they up to it? Are WE up to it?
Consider that the mantra of this group has been about "change". I suggest that is inadequate. How about "Transformation?" Transformation of the board into a force for positive change. Not "change" as we normally think of it, nor "change" as a buzzword, something desirable which we should therefore all aspire to. I don't mean change as it has been most recently expressed in this association, an association that works for some of us, or a few of us, or sometimes the majority of us. I mean a transformation into an association that works for all of us. For it is my perspective that an association that doesn't work for "all" in fact, works for none. Organizations in which "some" goals are achieved, or, in this case are working for "some" owners, are inherently inadequate.
What would that look like? Would you like to live in such an association?
It's your choice. We can all be a force for change, both positive and negative, or we can be a force for transformation. I choose the latter. How would that look on our board? As an example, such a board, that is, a board "that is working for all of us" as stewards and as leaders, would approach issues entirely from the perspective of performing their "fiduciary duties". When an issue came before such a board, each and every board member would be ready, willing and able to discuss, argue and present both and all sides of any issue or argument. By contrast, in a board that is coming from "change", individual members present or advocate only that side that serves them or a group or groups in this association.
Wouldn't that be interesting? Wouldn't that be empowering? For each of our board members to be knowledgeable in all aspects and all "sides" of the issues? To see each board member promote all sides, both the pros and the cons, of all issues, both large and small at all times, instead of the current approach that "its right" to do this and "it's wrong" to do that, or "it's just" for this to occur and "it's unjust" for that to occur.
It would be a manifestation of an association that works for all of us, each and every one of us, not a few and not the many, but all of us. It would be the manifestation of a board that is really up to the task and is seriously engaged in an inquiry about leadership and stewardship.
Will this happen here? Can this happen here? Well, as I said in an earlier post, this is 2010 and it will not be a repeat of 2009. I am committed to that.
But what are you committed to?
Is such failure pre-ordained? Is it inherent in the structure of this organization and is it woven into the fabric, its very being? Are we destined, as a former board member once told me "to slip continuously into mediocrity?"
There are questions which would seem to be vital and must be asked. If we are not to simply operate out of subjective "change" which is defined as positive and negative, and based upon fundamental human issues such as fear and greed, and "winners" and "losers" then what should we be operating from? These are questions for our leaders to ask, to answer and to express in their daily actions. Leadership on the board and by the board as a single entity is the only possible way out of the morass that encompasses this association.
Are they up to it? Are WE up to it?
I'm sure a few readers wonder where I have been going with this blog over the past 120 posts, and where I have been coming from. It's probably time to tell you. You have been very patient and gracious.
What would that look like? Would you like to live in such an association?
It's your choice. We can all be a force for change, both positive and negative, or we can be a force for transformation. I choose the latter. How would that look on our board? As an example, such a board, that is, a board "that is working for all of us" as stewards and as leaders, would approach issues entirely from the perspective of performing their "fiduciary duties". When an issue came before such a board, each and every board member would be ready, willing and able to discuss, argue and present both and all sides of any issue or argument. By contrast, in a board that is coming from "change", individual members present or advocate only that side that serves them or a group or groups in this association.
Wouldn't that be interesting? Wouldn't that be empowering? For each of our board members to be knowledgeable in all aspects and all "sides" of the issues? To see each board member promote all sides, both the pros and the cons, of all issues, both large and small at all times, instead of the current approach that "its right" to do this and "it's wrong" to do that, or "it's just" for this to occur and "it's unjust" for that to occur.
It would be a manifestation of an association that works for all of us, each and every one of us, not a few and not the many, but all of us. It would be the manifestation of a board that is really up to the task and is seriously engaged in an inquiry about leadership and stewardship.
Will this happen here? Can this happen here? Well, as I said in an earlier post, this is 2010 and it will not be a repeat of 2009. I am committed to that.
But what are you committed to?
Sunday, December 13, 2009
Thought of the Day
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt .
-- George Eliot
This is paraphrased from the passage:
Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.
-- Bible, 'Proverbs' 17:28
-- George Eliot
This is paraphrased from the passage:
Even a fool, when he holdeth his peace, is counted wise: and he that shutteth his lips is esteemed a man of understanding.
-- Bible, 'Proverbs' 17:28
Labels:
Thought of the Day
Monday, December 7, 2009
Thought of the Day
" The opposite of good is not evil, the opposite of good is indifference,"
- Abraham Joshua Heschel
- Abraham Joshua Heschel
Labels:
Thought of the Day
Friday, December 4, 2009
Thought of the Day
"Knowledge pursues me but I am faster....."
-Anonymous
-Anonymous
Labels:
Thought of the Day
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)